links for 2007-03-11
-
Tom Curley: “The citizen community has produced some of the most exciting counters to cover-ups. The growth in public involvement and sophistication in information gathering and distributing are among the most positive signs in connecting the people to th
-
“The latest predictions from Deloitte there is a high risk that the vast volumes of digital information bouncing around the planet could exceed the web’s available capacity before the year is out.”
-
The New Yorker has relaunched its web site. Lots of white space, lots of video. Jason Kottke has a careful analysis of the changes.
-
A classic New Yorker cartoon, now animated.
-
The reason Holovaty and Curley stand out is “not that their ideas are so much better than the ideas of a 100 other smart people in the newspaper business — it’s because they’ve been given the freedom to pursue those ideas”
-
Kevin Mitchell: “I was talking to a room full of journalism students in Eastbourne the other night. … I asked the students how many of them got their first sports news from the web. Nearly all put up their hands. It was a jolting response.”
-
Naughton agrees with Nick Carr’s digital sharecropping thesis. To media orgs, UGC is free. “Users give it to you gratis in return for your kind provision of a space in which they can publish. So all that remains is for you to devise a way of ‘monetising’
-
“Some 452,000 national daily sales have disappeared in a year. … Meanwhile, websites are buoyant. Journalists’ words are read more widely than ever. But when are we going to be able to measure that properly and start cautiously to smile again?”
-
Measuring online readership “is further confused by what you measure and how you measure it. Online is global; most advertisers are national, regional or local. And how are we measuring the numbers logging on to a particular newspaper website…”
-
Edwina Currie: “I had never read my Wikipedia article before. Now I have, I’ve lined up with critics who say the online encyclopedia is rubbish.” Peter Tatchell, Peter Hitchens and Craig Murray have much more favourable views of their entries.
/2007/03/11/links-for-2007-03-11/