Scandals and subpoenas
Hendrik Hertzberg makes an important observation in the New Yorker:
What all the memorable scandals of the past thirty years—real and fake alike, from Watergate to the Clinton impeachment—have had in common is that the opposition party controlled at least one house of Congress, which gave it the power to hold hearings and issue subpoenas. If Bush ends up having an easier time of it in his second term than any of his two-term predecessors since F.D.R., it won’t be because the scandals aren’t there. It’ll be because the tools to excavate them are under lock and key.
It’s about Gannongate, so blog navel-gazers will want to read the rest.
/2005/02/21/scandals-and-subpoenas/